Item Coversheet
AGENDA - November 16, 2017

6.0
INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS & STUDENT ACTIVITIES
6.2  Learning Report: California Accountability Model & School Dashboard  (Reports)
 

Background Information:

What is the California School Dashboard?

The California Department of Education created the California School Dashboard to show how local educational agencies and schools are performing on the indicators included in California’s new accountability system.  The Dashboard is the next step in a series of major shifts in California TK-12 schools, changes that have raised the bar for student learning, transformed testing and placed the focus on equity for all students.

 

Why was the Dashboard Created?

The Dashboard is a component of the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) law passed in 2013 that significantly changed how California provides funding to public schools and holds LEAs accountable for student performance.  LCFF law required that the State Board of Education adopt a new accountability tool that reflects performance in different priority areas identified in the law.  The Dashboard shows performance data publicly and is made up of reports that specifically show LEA or school performance on six state indicators and four local indicators.

 

What is different about California’s new school accountability system?

Our new system provides a more complete picture of how schools are meeting the needs of all students.  There are three important advantages to California’s new approach:

  •  More than a single number:  The multiple measures of student success define a quality education more broadly than a single test score.
  •  Equity:  There is an increased focus on identifying and addressing disparities among student groups.
  • Supporting Local Decision Making:  State accountability tools provide information to support local planning process around improving student performance. 

Reports:

California Accountability Model & School Dashboard

 

What are the LEA requirements relative to the Dashboard?

Beginning this school year, 2017-2018, the Dashboard will be in full implementation.  The data within the Dashboard will be publicly released on December 1, 2017.  Before this date, LEAs must complete the self-reflection tool to receive a Met rating on the Dashboard.  The self-reflection tools are designed to support LEAs in measuring their progress on the following local indicators:

  • Basic Services
  • Implementation of State Academic Standards
  • Parent Engagement
  • School Climate

 

How is performance measured on the local indicators?

LEAs receive one of three ratings based on whether they have measured and reported their progress through the Dashboard using locally collected data.  The ratings are:  Met, Not Met, or Not Met for Two or More Years.  For example, on the local indicator for Implementing State Academic Standards (Priority 2), the LEA would receive a Met rating if it: 

  • Annually measures its progress
  • Reports the results at a regularly scheduled meeting of the local governing board
  • Reports the results to stakeholders through the Dashboard

 

What are the performance standards for the local performance indicators?

Priority 1: Appropriately Assigned Teachers, Access to Curriculum-Aligned Instructional Materials, and Safe, Clean and Functional School Facilities

LEA annually measures its progress in meeting the Williams settlement requirements at 100% of all its school sites, as applicable, and promptly addresses any complaints or other deficiencies identified throughout the academic year, as applicable.

 

Priority 2:  Implementation of State Academic Standards

LEA annually measures its progress implementing state academic standards

 

Priority 3:  Parent Engagement

LEA annually measures its progress in (1) seeking input from parents in decision making and

(2) promoting parental participation in programs

 

Priority 6:  School Climate

LEA administers a local climate survey at least every other year that provides a valid measure of perceptions of school safety and connectedness, such as the California Healthy Kids Survey, to students in at least one grade within the grade span(s) that the LEA serves (e.g., K-5, 6-8, 9-12).

 

CUSD Priority 1 Local Indicator:  MET

 

Performance Standards

Number/Percentage

Misassignments of teachers of English learners, total teacher misassignments, and vacant teacher positions

 

0

Students without access to their own copies of standards-aligned instructional materials for use at school and at home

 

0

Instances where facilities do not meet the “good repair” standard (including deficiencies and extreme deficiencies)

 

0

 

CUSD Priority 2 Local Indicator:  MET

 

1.  Progress in providing professional learning for teaching to the recently adopted academic

     standards and/or curriculum frameworks identified below:

Content Area

1

2

3

4

5

ELA – Common Core State Standards for ELA

 

 

 

X

 

ELD (Aligned to the ELA Standards)

 

X

 

 

 

Mathematics – Common Core State Standards for Mathematics

 

 

X

 

 

Next Generation Science Standards

 

 

X

 

 

History-Social Science

X

 

 

 

 

Rating Scale:  1-Exploration and Research Phase; 2-Beginning Development; 3-Initial Implementation; 4-Full Implementation;

5-Full Implementation and Sustainability

 

2.  Progress in making instructional materials that are aligned to the recently adopted academic

     standards and/or curriculum frameworks identified below available in all classrooms where the

     subject is taught:

Content Area

1

2

3

4

5

ELA – Common Core State Standards for ELA

 

 

X

 

 

ELD (Aligned to the ELA Standards)

 

 

X

 

 

Mathematics – Common Core State Standards for Mathematics

 

 

X

 

 

Next Generation Science Standards

 

X

 

 

 

History-Social Science

X

 

 

 

 

Rating Scale:  1-Exploration and Research Phase; 2-Beginning Development; 3-Initial Implementation; 4-Full Implementation;

5-Full Implementation and Sustainability

 

3.  Progress in implementing policies or programs to support staff in identifying areas where they

     can improve in delivering instruction aligned to the recently adopted academic standards and/or

     curriculum frameworks identified below (e.g., collaborative time, focused classroom

     walkthroughs, teacher pairing):

Content Area

1

2

3

4

5

ELA – Common Core State Standards for ELA

 

 

 

X

 

ELD (Aligned to the ELA Standards)

 

X

 

 

 

Mathematics – Common Core State Standards for Mathematics

 

 

 

X

 

Next Generation Science Standards

 

 

X

 

 

History-Social Science

X

 

 

 

 

Rating Scale:  1-Exploration and Research Phase; 2-Beginning Development; 3-Initial Implementation; 4-Full Implementation;

5-Full Implementation and Sustainability

 

4.  Progress in implementing each of the following academic standards adopted by the state board

     for all students:

Content Area

1

2

3

4

5

Career Technical Education

 

 

 

X

 

Health Education Content Standards

 

X

 

 

 

Physical Education Model Content Standards

 

 

 

X

 

Visual and Performing Arts

 

 

 

X

 

World Language

 

 

X

 

 

Rating Scale:  1-Exploration and Research Phase; 2-Beginning Development; 3-Initial Implementation; 4-Full Implementation;

5-Full Implementation and Sustainability

 

5.  During the 2015-2016 school year (including summer 2015), rate the LEAs success at engaging

     in the following activities with teachers and school administrators:

Content Area

1

2

3

4

5

Identifying the professional learning needs of groups of teachers or staff as a whole

 

 

X

 

 

Identifying the professional learning needs of individual teachers

 

 

X

 

 

Providing support for teachers on the standards they have not yet mastered

 

 

X

 

 

Rating Scale:  1-Exploration and Research Phase; 2-Beginning Development; 3-Initial Implementation; 4-Full Implementation;

5-Full Implementation and Sustainability

 

6.  Provide any additional information that the LEA believes is relevant to understanding its

     progress implementing the academic standards adopted by the State Board:  No additional

     comments at this time.

 

CUSD Priority 3 Local Indicator:  MET

Summary of progress toward (1) seeking input from parents/guardians in school and district decision making; and (2) promoting parental participation in programs: 

 

            According to our district’s annual Communication, Support and Learning surveys, 68% of parents indicated they feel connected to and informed about their child’s experience in CUSD, 71% indicated the schools maintain open lines of communication for parents to ask questions and express concerns, 71% indicated that staff returns phone calls, emails, and other communications in a timely manner, 72% indicated our schools clearly communicate high expectations for all students, and 84% indicated that school communication with families occurs in an open and respectful manner.  The district’s LCAP committee also developed surveys to seek input from parents/guardians relative to the effectiveness of our LCAP goals and actions.  All survey results are used to refine practices and revise the LCAP goals and actions for the following year.

 

CUSD Priority 6 Local Indicator:  MET

Summary of the local administration and analysis of a local climate survey that captures a valid measure of student perceptions of school safety and connectedness.

 

The California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) was used because it is widely used across the state of California.  The following are the key findings from the 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 CHKS administrations. 

                                                                         Response Rate

Grade Level

2014-2015

2016-2017

5

64%

54%

7

85%

90%

9

62%

-

11

69%

78%

                                                          School is perceived as very safe or safe

Grade Level

2014-2015

2016-2017

5

80%

87%

7

88%

79%

9

85%

-

11

92%

87%

                                                                     School Connectedness

Grade Level

2014-2015

2016-2017

5

54%

62%

7

75%

73%

9

67%

-

11

66%

66%

 

                                                   

Financial Impact:
None
LEARNING: Integrate personalized learning with assessment methods that will prepare all students for academic and vocational success:
1. Standards Aligned Core Curriculum, Assessment and Instruction

COMMUNICATION: Communicate openly, freely and accurately to engage and involve all shareholders:

3. Informative Communication to the CUSD Community