California Accountability Model & School Dashboard
What are the LEA requirements relative to the Dashboard?
Beginning this school year, 2017-2018, the Dashboard will be in full implementation. The data within the Dashboard will be publicly released on December 1, 2017. Before this date, LEAs must complete the self-reflection tool to receive a Met rating on the Dashboard. The self-reflection tools are designed to support LEAs in measuring their progress on the following local indicators:
- Implementation of State Academic Standards
How is performance measured on the local indicators?
LEAs receive one of three ratings based on whether they have measured and reported their progress through the Dashboard using locally collected data. The ratings are: Met, Not Met, or Not Met for Two or More Years. For example, on the local indicator for Implementing State Academic Standards (Priority 2), the LEA would receive a Met rating if it:
- Annually measures its progress
- Reports the results at a regularly scheduled meeting of the local governing board
- Reports the results to stakeholders through the Dashboard
What are the performance standards for the local performance indicators?
Priority 1: Appropriately Assigned Teachers, Access to Curriculum-Aligned Instructional Materials, and Safe, Clean and Functional School Facilities
LEA annually measures its progress in meeting the Williams settlement requirements at 100% of all its school sites, as applicable, and promptly addresses any complaints or other deficiencies identified throughout the academic year, as applicable.
Priority 2: Implementation of State Academic Standards
LEA annually measures its progress implementing state academic standards
Priority 3: Parent Engagement
LEA annually measures its progress in (1) seeking input from parents in decision making and
(2) promoting parental participation in programs
Priority 6: School Climate
LEA administers a local climate survey at least every other year that provides a valid measure of perceptions of school safety and connectedness, such as the California Healthy Kids Survey, to students in at least one grade within the grade span(s) that the LEA serves (e.g., K-5, 6-8, 9-12).
CUSD Priority 1 Local Indicator: MET
Performance Standards
|
Number/Percentage
|
Misassignments of teachers of English learners, total teacher misassignments, and vacant teacher positions
|
0
|
Students without access to their own copies of standards-aligned instructional materials for use at school and at home
|
0
|
Instances where facilities do not meet the “good repair” standard (including deficiencies and extreme deficiencies)
|
0
|
CUSD Priority 2 Local Indicator: MET
1. Progress in providing professional learning for teaching to the recently adopted academic
standards and/or curriculum frameworks identified below:
Content Area
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
ELA – Common Core State Standards for ELA
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
ELD (Aligned to the ELA Standards)
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Mathematics – Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Next Generation Science Standards
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
History-Social Science
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Rating Scale: 1-Exploration and Research Phase; 2-Beginning Development; 3-Initial Implementation; 4-Full Implementation;
5-Full Implementation and Sustainability
2. Progress in making instructional materials that are aligned to the recently adopted academic
standards and/or curriculum frameworks identified below available in all classrooms where the
subject is taught:
Content Area
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
ELA – Common Core State Standards for ELA
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
ELD (Aligned to the ELA Standards)
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Mathematics – Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Next Generation Science Standards
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
History-Social Science
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Rating Scale: 1-Exploration and Research Phase; 2-Beginning Development; 3-Initial Implementation; 4-Full Implementation;
5-Full Implementation and Sustainability
3. Progress in implementing policies or programs to support staff in identifying areas where they
can improve in delivering instruction aligned to the recently adopted academic standards and/or
curriculum frameworks identified below (e.g., collaborative time, focused classroom
walkthroughs, teacher pairing):
Content Area
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
ELA – Common Core State Standards for ELA
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
ELD (Aligned to the ELA Standards)
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Mathematics – Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Next Generation Science Standards
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
History-Social Science
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Rating Scale: 1-Exploration and Research Phase; 2-Beginning Development; 3-Initial Implementation; 4-Full Implementation;
5-Full Implementation and Sustainability
4. Progress in implementing each of the following academic standards adopted by the state board
for all students:
Content Area
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Career Technical Education
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Health Education Content Standards
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Physical Education Model Content Standards
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Visual and Performing Arts
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
World Language
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Rating Scale: 1-Exploration and Research Phase; 2-Beginning Development; 3-Initial Implementation; 4-Full Implementation;
5-Full Implementation and Sustainability
5. During the 2015-2016 school year (including summer 2015), rate the LEAs success at engaging
in the following activities with teachers and school administrators:
Content Area
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Identifying the professional learning needs of groups of teachers or staff as a whole
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Identifying the professional learning needs of individual teachers
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Providing support for teachers on the standards they have not yet mastered
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Rating Scale: 1-Exploration and Research Phase; 2-Beginning Development; 3-Initial Implementation; 4-Full Implementation;
5-Full Implementation and Sustainability
6. Provide any additional information that the LEA believes is relevant to understanding its
progress implementing the academic standards adopted by the State Board: No additional
comments at this time.
CUSD Priority 3 Local Indicator: MET
Summary of progress toward (1) seeking input from parents/guardians in school and district decision making; and (2) promoting parental participation in programs:
According to our district’s annual Communication, Support and Learning surveys, 68% of parents indicated they feel connected to and informed about their child’s experience in CUSD, 71% indicated the schools maintain open lines of communication for parents to ask questions and express concerns, 71% indicated that staff returns phone calls, emails, and other communications in a timely manner, 72% indicated our schools clearly communicate high expectations for all students, and 84% indicated that school communication with families occurs in an open and respectful manner. The district’s LCAP committee also developed surveys to seek input from parents/guardians relative to the effectiveness of our LCAP goals and actions. All survey results are used to refine practices and revise the LCAP goals and actions for the following year.
CUSD Priority 6 Local Indicator: MET
Summary of the local administration and analysis of a local climate survey that captures a valid measure of student perceptions of school safety and connectedness.
The California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) was used because it is widely used across the state of California. The following are the key findings from the 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 CHKS administrations.
Response Rate
Grade Level
|
2014-2015
|
2016-2017
|
5
|
64%
|
54%
|
7
|
85%
|
90%
|
9
|
62%
|
-
|
11
|
69%
|
78%
|
School is perceived as very safe or safe
Grade Level
|
2014-2015
|
2016-2017
|
5
|
80%
|
87%
|
7
|
88%
|
79%
|
9
|
85%
|
-
|
11
|
92%
|
87%
|
School Connectedness
Grade Level
|
2014-2015
|
2016-2017
|
5
|
54%
|
62%
|
7
|
75%
|
73%
|
9
|
67%
|
-
|
11
|
66%
|
66%
|